ABOUT CHERYL

ABOUT CHERYL

FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY TAUGHT ME
TO READ THE PATTERN.
PROGRAM LEADERSHIP TAUGHT ME
WHAT TO DO WITH IT.

FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY TAUGHT ME
TO READ THE PATTERN.
PROGRAM LEADERSHIP TAUGHT ME
WHAT TO DO WITH IT.

FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY TAUGHT ME TO READ THE PATTERN. PROGRAM LEADERSHIP TAUGHT ME WHAT TO DO WITH IT.

Forensic psychology trained me to question the stated story—to separate fact from interpretation, examine motives and incentives, test assumptions, and pay attention to the patterns that reveal how
an arrangement actually operates.

Forensic psychology trained me to question the stated story—to separate fact from interpretation, examine motives and incentives, test assumptions, and pay attention to the patterns that reveal howan arrangement
actually operates.

Nearly two decades in financial services and strategic program leadership taught me to turn that analysis into action: assess risk, quantify consequences, map dependencies, anticipate stakeholder response, and build
an executable path through complex decisions.

Forensic psychology trained me to question the stated story—
to separate fact from interpretation, examine motives and incentives, test assumptions, and pay attention to the patterns that reveal how
an arrangement actually operates.

Nearly two decades in financial services and strategic program leadership taught me to turn that analysis into action: assess risk, quantify consequences, map dependencies, anticipate stakeholder response, and build an executable path through complex decisions.

Black and white photo of executive and organizational consultant Cheryl Carreau, leaning against a white wall, smiling and wearing a black blazer.

MY STORY

THE STATED PROBLEM IS
RARELY THE WHOLE PROBLEM.

THE STATED PROBLEM
IS RARELY
THE WHOLE PROBLEM.

THE STATED PROBLEM
IS RARELY
THE WHOLE PROBLEM.

MY BEGINNINGS

MY BEGINNINGS

Long before I worked inside boardrooms,
I was interested in what people did when the stakes were high—and in the gap between what people said, what they believed, and what their behavior actually revealed.

That instinct became a discipline: look for the pattern, test the explanation, and ask what is really driving the outcome.

Long before I worked inside boardrooms, I was interested in what people did when the stakes were high—and in the gap between what people said, what they believed, and what their behavior
actually revealed.

That instinct became a discipline: look
for the pattern, test the explanation, and ask what is really driving the outcome.

Long before I worked inside boardrooms, I was interested in what people did when the stakes were high—and in the gap between what people said, what they believed, and what their behavior actually revealed.

That instinct became a discipline: look for the pattern, test the explanation, and ask what is really driving the outcome.

FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY

FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY

FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY

My M.A. in Forensic Psychology,
with concentration in neuroscience and psychopathology, gave me a formal framework for analyzing behavior, competing narratives, motives, risk, and the difference between observation and interpretation.

I first applied that training in work involving competency assessments for the New York City courts, and later carried the same analytical discipline into complex
corporate environments.

The lesson stayed with me: motives matter more than moods, and patterns matter more than isolated moments.

My M.A. in Forensic Psychology, with concentration in neuroscience and psychopathology, gave me a formal framework for analyzing behavior, competing narratives, motives, risk, and the difference between observation and interpretation.

I first applied that training in work involving competency assessments for the New York City courts, and later carried the same analytical discipline into complex corporate environments.

The lesson stayed with me: motives matter more than moods, and patterns matter more than isolated moments.

INSIDE THE CORPORATE WALLS

INSIDE THE CORPORATE WALLS

Nearly two decades in financial services added another layer: economics, incentives, risk, authority, dependencies, stakeholders, and execution.

I worked across banking, wealth management, strategic programs, implementation, and adoption—environments where a decision could be analytically sound and still fail if the operating realities were ignored.

That is where the two disciplines came together: forensic analysis to establish what is true, and program leadership to determine what can actually be done about it.

Black and white photo of Cheryl Carreau and her white dog.
Black and white photo of Cheryl Carreau smiling with her white dog.

THE DISCIPLINES BEHIND
THE WORK

THE DISCIPLINES BEHIND
THE WORK

FINANCE & COMPLEX SYSTEMS

FINANCE & COMPLEX SYSTEMS

FINANCE & COMPLEX SYSTEMS

Nearly two decades in financial services taught me to read economics, incentives, authority, competing interests, risk, and the consequences of decisions made inside complex institutions.

FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY

FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY

FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY


My M.A. in Forensic Psychology trained me to separate observation from interpretation, test competing explanations, examine motives and patterns, and assess what the available evidence actually supports.

PROGRAM & EXECUTION STRATEGY

PROGRAM & EXECUTION STRATEGY

PROGRAM & EXECUTION STRATEGY

Project and program leadership taught me to turn analysis into action: sequence the work, map dependencies, manage stakeholders, anticipate failure points, and build plans that can survive contact with reality.

EXECUTIVE & ORGANIZATION ADVISORY

CERTIFIED EXECUTIVECOACH

EXECUTIVE & ORGANIZATION ADVISORY

Executive coaching sharpened my ability to understand how capable people make decisions under pressure—and how incentives, operating conditions, and human behavior affect what happens next.

DECISION STRATEGY

DECISION STRATEGY

DECISION STRATEGY

Forensic Strategic Advisory brings those disciplines together: establish what is true, determine what the situation supports, and build the strategy around the decision you make.

THE STANDARD

THE OBJECTIVE ISN’T CERTAINTY.
IT’S A DECISION STRONG ENOUGH TO WITHSTAND SCRUTINY, CHANGING CONDITIONS, AND HINDSIGHT.

THE OBJECTIVE ISN’T CERTAINTY. IT’S A DECISION STRONG ENOUGH TO WITHSTAND SCRUTINY, CHANGING CONDITIONS, AND HINDSIGHT.